Elon Musk states that we live in modeling caused by technological progress

Elon Musk observed while meeting with the White House office in Washington.

Foto: EFE – Shawn Thew / Pool

Billionaire Elon Musk said the reality in which we live could become a computer program developed by higher intelligence. Although the idea does not belong to him, it protects it for years and becomes part of his public speech.

🔑Keys to Elon Musk theory (in case he aspires)

• Elon Musk claims we live in modeling.
• The idea became popular in 2016 at the Code Conference.
• Nick Bostrom raised his hypothesis in 2003 with Oxford.
• Mit, Bon and NASA researchers are looking for “failures” in the universe.
• Sean Carol prevents contradictions in modeling theory.

Musk is responsible for attracting this philosophical and scientific discussion to the public sphere, as it was usually in academic conditions. But the reality is that the possibility that everything we know is modeling is attracted to many.

The first time the businessman told about it publicly in 2016 in Conference code In California, when he assured that “the chances we live in basic reality are one of thousands of millions.”

Musk claims that technological progress is the maximum proof of the theory that determines because there are now millions of people who interact with 3D models of growing realism.

If this evolution goes behind, there will be a time when the difference between modeling and real life will be impossible. In this panorama, it seems reasonable to assume that advanced civilization has already reached such technological level.

📌 Where does this theory come from?

Currently, this idea is being discussed in an interview, social networks and online forums, but the origin of the discussion is connected with the philosopher Nick Bastrom, Professor Oxford University. In 2003, the academician caused the possibility that no civilization would reach the point of creating realistic simulations, or that, on the other hand, these simulations already exist and we enter one of them without knowing it.

Musk adheres to the second opportunity, I am sure that we are already in modeling.

In addition to the philosophical area, science also sought to approach this topic. MIT researchers, Bonn University and NASA’s projects have developed experiments to identify possible “failures in the Code of the Universe”.

Some hypotheses believe that space-time may behave like a pixel network. The border definition is that the space permit will indicate that the universe is not continuous but programmed. Other scientists have studied anomalies in quantum physics, interpreting them as possible programming errors.

“Modeling hypothesis does not work because we can create complete modeling of the universes, but if it was true, we must see the universes in the universes, which will lead us to contradiction,” Karol’s cosmologist said Mindscape and public conferences.

👀🌎📄 Have you learned about the latest news in the world? We invite you to see them in the viewer.

🌏📰🗽 ViewerCompletely to offer readers the best experience, created a strategic alliance with the New York Times at a 30 %discount.

This plan offers a complete informative experience, combining better Colombian journalism with the New York Times. Do not miss the opportunity to access all these benefits and more. Subscribe here at the Superprémium El Epoador Plan Today and Live Journalism from a global point of view!

📧 📬 🌍 If you are interested in getting a weekly news resume and analysis of the international section ViewerYou can enter our portfolio newslettersLook for “is not the end of the world” and register in our newsletter. If you want to contact the team, you can do this by writing at mmedina@elesspectador.com OA cgomez@elespectador.com