Elon Musk He is obsessed Artificial intelligence. A person responsible for Tesla or SpaceX, considered the possibility of what Let’s live in modeling. In the past tycoon spoke about it in public but a few days, some statements They became particularly viral. And This is not less.
“The number of ballots we need to be in the original reality is minimal, almost non -existent, something like thousands of millions”. The verdict, which seems to be leaving the pen of scientifically, photo prose, was handed over to Musk himself at the 2016 code conference with the same nature with which he usually talks about sending missiles to Mars or electrification of the planet from Tesla. Since then, did not stop repeatingas a mantra that ranges between intellectual provocation and self -paragraph.
Elon Musk says our existence is modeling: The chances of being in the basic reality virtually zero
The funniest thing is Musk nothing comes up: Modeling Hypothesis is a doctrine discussed in philosophical and academic Mbb. That did the tycoon, it take it up to main time cultural discussions, Getting what millions of people are wondering if in reality we don’t live in a computer code So difficult that we are confused with the material. That is, as if our life was no more in the game MatrixThis 1999 movie, which today works as the most popular Metfor of this theory.
The idea, which seemed to be an exclusive heritage of the enthusiasm and thermos -philosophers, became the subject of a global desktop. This is no accident: the image of our existence as A giant video game It almost perfectly fits into the digital culture in which we are immersed. Musk lifts him as if he was obvious.
“We have forty years Pong. Today we enjoy open worlds with 3D with millions of players that interact in real time. If we design this curve into the future, Get the point if there is no difference between video games and reality. Approach not only excites but also fascinates: if this technology is possible, What prevents us from thinking that this has already been developed?
“
Get the point if there is no difference between video games and reality
Deta in this futuristic story is not only Musk but also the work of the Oxford philosopher, Nick bostrom. In 2003 Public essay that became the text of the title: Do you live in computer modeling? There are three scripts. First, pessimistic where No civilization reaches a substitute technical ability to develop perfect modeling.
The second, more sober in which Civilizations achieve this ability, but decide not to use it. And thirdly, the most disturbing: that these simulations already exist and what we, not knowing it, are the characters who got into one of them. Musk admits that it was these reasoning convinced him of this Practically safety We do not live in basic reality.
Science did not pay attention to this secret, and, most of all, philosophical speculation, tried to study it with empathetic instruments. MIT Researchers and Bono University offered experiments for open If in space-time there is structure PixiladeAs if our reality was limited to the screen. Even some works related to NASA suggested to certain amazing FSIC behavior They may be simple programming failurescracks in the hidden code. There is no convincing evidence, but a simple attempt opens a fascinating vain scientific speculation.
The popular culture contributed to the consolidation of this imaginary. Matrix The hypothesis becomes a modern myth with its ICNIC -Milk: a red bundle, a green code, the opening of the fictional world. Perhaps more than asking whether we live in modeling, we need to ask what Quinn will write this scenario.
(Tagstotranslate) false tags
