Who is more and who if -did not load Append VPN Go privately through the network or skip some other regional restrictions. Well if you used any of the 20, which seems to be a study called “Hidden links: Analysis of Secret Families VPN Applications”You have a problem because apparently Many VPN – this is not what they seem.
This study you can read in this link found that more than 20 most popular VPN applications share both the common (from the code and from the servers to the hidden owners) that Exponentially multiply the risk of any attacks that any of them suffers, regardless of anyone.
The same characteristics are the same risks
The aforementioned study published by Citizen Lab (Toronto University) and Arizona State University analyzed 100 More downloaded VPN applications In Google Play Store. Without waiting, they found that 21 of them belonged to, in fact, three large families of suppliers, although they represent themselves with different companies that compete with each other. This is these:
- Family A: Companies such as an innovative compound, autumn wind and lemon carnation responsible for applications such as Turbo VPN, VPN Proxy Master and Snap VPN. All safety failures, including coded passwords for Shadowsocks, a protocol used to evade censorship in China but not intended to protect anonymity.
- A family b: Six suppliers behind applications such as XY VPN, Global VPN and Super Z VPN, which use the same pre -defined servers and passwords. Many of them would be related to the Chinese company QIHOO 360, sanctioned in the US for ties with the popular liberation army.
- Family C: Fast potatoes and free connected limited, responsible for fast VPN potatoes and X-VPN, also vulnerable to attacks such as “blind in the route attack”, which allows you to manipulate the traffic when the attacker is on the same network.
Together these applications accumulate More than 700 million bootTherefore, there is a great chance that they are some of those you used in your life.
But, more seriously than her high diffusion, that’s what They have the same security failures. And we do not say that they are subject to the same attacks, without their vulnerabilities the same. Here we are talking about outdated encryption, static passwords and a secret location collection, even if their privacy policy confirms otherwise.
So the dispute goes beyond users to believe they choose from independent competitors when they really load virtually cloned foods. This is not just a problem of transparency, but also a serious risk of safety, because anyone who has basic knowledge of reverse technology can decipher the passwords used in them or the traffic they are processing.
These studies make it clear that you should be very careful when choosing our trusted applications, because many times cheap expensive. Thus, choose the first free and popular VPN option in the store is not recommended in terms of privacy. And yes, platforms such as Google Play Store must do more to identify this type of app and related risks.
