Several experts have warned the US government about the risks of its sanctions with China. Your forecast has been fulfilled

Jensen Huang, Co -counter and Nvidia CEO made it clear in one of the statements he made during the already far computer 2023: “China devotes mass resources Before the implementation of new companies specializing in GPU development. They should not be underestimated. “This warning was aimed at the US government in a precise attempt to prevent the consequences of sanctions seeking to stop China’s technological development.

However, this statement is not the only one that Juan made in order to describe the strategy of this giant Asian country. This executive director also says that “if China can’t buy chips for artificial intelligence (AI), it will simply produce them.” This is just what you do. This is demonstrated by Porpholio Solutions for AI, which have developed Huawei, Cambricon Technologies or Moore Threads, among many other Chinese companies.

It is likely that in 2026 China reaches technological self -determination

Jensen Juan is not the only expert who warned the US government and its allies that its sanctions are promoting a flight forward. This is a statement by Mark Hizhinka, a Dutch journalist in the field of semiconductors and the author of the strongly recommended book “Focus: ASML Way”, very strongly expresses the influence that the prohibited US and the Netherlands can have on business ASML and technological development of China:

China is already at the forefront of particle physics. Its new neutrino detector - the most advanced that exists

“I think the great disappointment that ASML feels is that when restricted sales of its machines, not only in extreme ultraviolet lithography (Uve), but also immersion, the ability of a Chinese competitor to enter the market. This can create a very powerful competitor (… Chinese are forced to use their own technologythat ultimately drives its innovation. We see the same thing in AI or Huawei, which creates chips even with limited lithography variants. “

Its purpose is to transfer their knowledge to China because they are convinced that despite their efforts, the US government will not be able to stop China’s technological progress

Let’s change the third. Liguo “RECOO” Zhang has been Chinese but has been living in the US for several decades and has worked in Siemens Eda, a US subsidiary of this German company that dominates the china design software market. Zhang is currently running the Chinese company SEIDA, and in the business plan he presented in 2022 to capture new investors, he has collected that his company would be prepared software for chips design in early 2024. However, that’s not all. And it was in this document that he defended that his plan went through “violation of a foreign monopoly”.

Supposedly, SEIDA software has already been used by SMIC, Hua Hong Semiconductor and other Chinese manufacturers of complex schemes. In fact, Smic is one of the investors of this company. Allen Chang Paylong, SEIDA Operations Director, says Zhang and other former Siemens Eda staff left this German campaign as a result of US sanctions. Its purpose was Pass your knowledge to China Because they are convinced that despite its efforts, the US government will not be able to stop China’s technological progress.

In the field of Chinese scientific development, it has also achieved significant achievements in recent years. In fact, in the cover of this article we see an ambitious experimental reactor nuclear merger CFETR (Chinese reactor with synthesis) that it is being built in this Asian country as an alternative to ITER. In any case, before completing this article, it is necessary to return to the technology sphere to make a bet: it is likely that in 2026 there is already its own uve Photolitography equipment in China. If this forecast is fulfilled by the country, led by Xi Jinping, it will reach its longing for technological self -sufficiency.

Imagen | News Xinhua

In Xataka | XI Jinping “Made in China in China”

In Xataka | “Invisible Monopoly” asml is indisputable. Although without the technology of these companies wouldn’t reach the top

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *